·

God Morgon

Tunisia · Europe · Geopolitics: the daily brief
Background

Ceuta, Schengen and the EU migration pact

Spain has checked identity and documents on the sea and air links out of Ceuta since joining Schengen, and the Commission says nobody who forced their way in reached mainland Spain or another member state: what Italy did was a month of checks on non-EU travellers from Spain, an ordinary power eight states were already using.

Ceuta, Schengen and the EU migration pact

Schengen is the area where 29 European states have abolished checks at their shared borders. Ceuta, a Spanish city on the Moroccan coast, is EU territory, but leaving it is not movement inside that area. In a declaration attached to its 1991 Schengen accession, Spain undertook to maintain identity and document checks on the sea and air connections out of Ceuta and Melilla, including those to the mainland. Article 41 of the Schengen Borders Code leaves those rules untouched. Crossing the fence reaches Spanish soil, not free movement.

That distinction was tested from the morning of 30 July 2026. Spain's interior ministry counted about 50,000 people crossing from Morocco; Ceuta's president, Juan Jesús Vivas, put it at up to 60,000. More than 48,000 went back within 48 hours, and thousands were still there days later. At least 72 had died by 2 August, drowned or crushed against a breakwater. It had happened before: around 9,000 entered in May 2021 after Moroccan police eased their controls.

A state may put controls back at its internal borders. Article 25 lists the grounds, among them sudden large-scale unauthorised movements of non-EU nationals between member states. Article 25a sets the clock. An unforeseeable threat buys one month, three at most. A foreseeable one buys six months, renewable to two years. The state decides and notifies; the Commission may only issue an opinion. Only the Council, on a Commission proposal, can recommend controls against a state that failed at its external border.

Italy's controls ran from 1 August, for a month, on non-EU travellers arriving from Spain by air or sea. Antonio Tajani called it a measure the treaties provide for. The analysts read it differently: Davide Colombi of CEPS says no single state can suspend Schengen, and nothing in the Code lets a country be removed from it. Eleonora Testi of ECRE calls it the first time controls have been imposed over arrivals in a country the acting state shares no border with.

The episode did not settle whether any of this costs anything. On 7 August 2026 the Commission's register listed internal border controls in eight states, and its June 2026 opinions to those past twelve months appear to have changed little. At least six European states, by the Asylum Information Database's count, have held some form of control almost continuously since 2015. The crisis route the pact opened on 1 July, four weeks before Ceuta, covers a third country pushing people at a border, but only if the affected state asks.

”The situation in Ceuta is unacceptable and I am in close contact with the Spanish authorities. I reiterate that there are no movements towards mainland Europe or other member states”
Magnus BrunnerEuropean Commissioner for Home Affairs and Migration

The numbers

People who entered Ceuta
About 50,000 crossed from Morocco from the morning of 30 July and 48,300 had returned by 6pm on 31 July, according to Spain's interior ministry. The head of Ceuta's local government, Juan Jesús Vivas, put it instead at as many as 60,000.
The death toll, three counts
At least 72 dead, confirmed on 2 August by Miguel Ángel Pérez, the Spanish government's representative in Ceuta, after five more bodies were found along the coast. The Spanish news agency EFE reported that the toll was expected to rise. Ceuta's president Juan Jesús Vivas had told El País that the city's morgue had received 88 bodies, some of them from earlier attempts over the previous two weeks. Morocco's interior ministry confirmed 11 deaths on its own side the same day and said it was still checking reports from the Spanish side.
Internal border controls in force
On 7 August 2026 the Commission's register listed notified internal border controls in eight Schengen states: Italy, Austria, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Germany, Sweden and France. Italy's measure runs from 1 August to 1 September 2026 and covers its internal air and sea borders with Spain.
How long the controls may last
Under article 25a of the Schengen Borders Code, an unforeseeable threat allows immediate controls for one month and no more than three. A foreseeable threat allows six months, renewable to a maximum of two years, and up to three years in a major exceptional situation. Article 27a obliges the Commission to issue an opinion once the controls reach twelve months in total.
The Ceuta and Melilla carve-out
In Spain's declaration on Ceuta and Melilla, in the Final Act to its 1991 accession to the Schengen Convention, Spain undertakes to maintain identity and document checks on sea and air connections leaving the two cities whose sole destination is any other place on Spanish territory, and on internal flights and regular ferry connections to another state party to the Convention.
When the pact's asylum rules began to apply
Regulation 2024/1348, the pact's asylum procedure regulation, has applied since 12 June 2026 under its article 79, seven weeks before the Ceuta crossings.
The pact's crisis and instrumentalisation route
Regulation 2024/1359 has applied since 1 July 2026 under its article 20. Article 1 counts as a crisis a third country encouraging or facilitating movement towards the external borders with the aim of destabilising the Union or a member state. Under article 2 that route opens only when the affected state sends the Commission a reasoned request.
The 2021 precedent
Around 9,000 people entered Ceuta from 17 May 2021, at least 1,200 of them unaccompanied minors, after Moroccan police temporarily eased border controls and opened the gates in their border fence, according to the European Parliament resolution of 10 June 2021.

What the comparison shows

Where they agree

Nobody disputes what happened at the fence or how it ended. Tens of thousands entered Ceuta, at least 72 were confirmed dead by 2 August, and on every official account none of them reached mainland Spain or any other Schengen state. Every side also accepts that the Code permits temporary internal border controls. The fight is about what that permission is for.

Where they split

Rome and Helsinki treat Italy's month of checks as a treaty power aimed at a state that failed at the external border. The bloc's centre of gravity moved that way within days: the leaders of 22 of the EU's 27 members wrote an open letter demanding an urgent interior ministers' meeting, a coordinated response and steps to prevent further uncontrolled crossings. Madrid answers that the treaties are not optional. The Commission has judged neither side: Brunner's point is only that nobody left Ceuta for the mainland, and von der Leyen credited Spanish and Moroccan police. The lawyers go furthest. CEPS and ECRE read the measure as political rather than operational, since nobody could have travelled onward from Ceuta anyway. The counts of who crossed diverge too: about 50,000 from Spain's interior ministry, up to 60,000 from Ceuta's president.

What nobody is saying

Nobody has said what happens if a state simply keeps its controls. The Commission must issue an opinion once controls pass twelve months, and it did so in June 2026, but an opinion binds nobody and eight states still had controls in force in August. Nor has anyone explained what changed since 2021, when the European Parliament found that Moroccan police had opened the gates in their fence and had not acted to stop the crossings, in the same resolution that called Morocco a privileged partner of the EU. What set off the 2026 surge is still disputed, and the Commission president credited Moroccan law enforcement with ending it.

Who says what

Antonio Tajani, Italy's foreign minister and deputy prime minister

Suspending free movement with Spain is not a breach of the rules but a power the treaties grant, and Ceuta shows that the Union's borders are a shared responsibility. Quoted from a post on X, in the English wording Euronews gave it.

”The temporary suspension of Schengen with Spain is a necessary choice to safeguard the security of our citizens and defend the European borders. A measure provided for by the treaties and made unavoidable today”The temporary suspension of Schengen with Spain is a necessary choice to safeguard the security of our citizens and defend the European borders. A measure provided for by the treaties and made unavoidable today
Magnus Brunner, European Commissioner for Home Affairs and Migration

The Commission's line is that the system held. Brunner points out that the Schengen Borders Code contains special provisions for Ceuta and Melilla and that checks on people departing Ceuta remained in force. Quoted from a post on X, in the English wording Euronews gave it.

”The situation in Ceuta is unacceptable and I am in close contact with the Spanish authorities. I reiterate that there are no movements towards mainland Europe or other member states”The situation in Ceuta is unacceptable and I am in close contact with the Spanish authorities. I reiterate that there are no movements towards mainland Europe or other member states
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission

The system held and the border was managed. Von der Leyen credits Spanish and Moroccan police with reversing the crossings, and says the Union now needs a lessons learned process.

”Due to the effective work of Spanish and Moroccan law enforcement. Not a single person reached mainland Spain or the rest of the EU”Due to the effective work of Spanish and Moroccan law enforcement. Not a single person reached mainland Spain or the rest of the EU
Pedro Sánchez, Spain's prime minister

Solidarity can be opted out of, the treaties cannot. Sánchez cites Frontex figures which he says show Italy recorded more irregular entries than Spain between 2021 and 2026. Quoted from a post on X, in the English wording Euronews gave it.

”solidarity and empathy are optional. Respect for European treaties and the facts is not”solidarity and empathy are optional. Respect for European treaties and the facts is not
Mari Rantanen, Finland's interior minister

The problem is at the external border, not the internal ones. Spain has failed to protect the Schengen area's external border, and that cannot continue. Quoted from a post on X, in the English wording Euronews gave it.

”Spain has completely failed to protect the external border of the Schengen area from incursions. This cannot continue”Spain has completely failed to protect the external border of the Schengen area from incursions. This cannot continue
Davide Colombi, researcher in the Justice and Home Affairs unit, CEPS

Neither what was promised nor what was feared was legally available. Colombi argues the decay began in 2015 and is driven by the Commission not enforcing EU law against the states that keep their controls. He adds that nobody from Ceuta could realistically have reached Italy.

”One member state cannot suspend Schengen. What it can do is temporarily reintroduce internal border controls”One member state cannot suspend Schengen. What it can do is temporarily reintroduce internal border controls
Eleonora Testi, senior legal officer at ECRE

The measure is new in kind, and Spain is being treated differently from others. Testi contrasts it with Poland, which suspended the right to claim asylum at its border with Belarus in March 2025 and was met with a proposed EU regulation to help it rather than with sanctions.

”the first time that a country has unilaterally reinstated Schengen border controls based on a large number of arrivals in a country with which it doesn't share internal borders”the first time that a country has unilaterally reinstated Schengen border controls based on a large number of arrivals in a country with which it doesn't share internal borders

Our coverage